Mineral Is Opque Until in Contact With Surface and Is Then Transparent Enough to Read

Authored past Kit Knightly via Off-Guardian.org,

You asked for it, so we made information technology. A collection of all the arguments yous'll ever need.

We get a lot of east-mails and private letters forth these lines"do you lot have a source for 10?" or"tin you point me to mask studies?" or"I know I saw a graph for mortality, but I can't find information technology anymore". And nosotros understand, it's been a long 18 months, and there are so many statistics and numbers to endeavour and keep straight in your head.

So, to deal with all these requests, we decided to brand a bullet-pointed and sourced list for all the fundamental points. A ane-stop-shop.

Hither are key facts and sources about the alleged "pandemic", that will help y'all become a grasp on what has happened to the world since Jan 2020, and help you enlighten whatsoever of your friends who might be yet trapped in the New Normal fog: "Covid deaths" – Lockdowns – PCR Tests – "asymptomatic infection" – Ventilators – Masks – Vaccines – Deception & Foreknowledge

*  *  *

PART I: "COVID DEATHS" & Bloodshed

1. The survival rate of "Covid" is over 99%. Authorities medical experts went out of their manner to underline, from the beginning of the pandemic, thatthe vast majority of the population are non in whatsoever danger from Covid.

Almost all studies on the infection-fatality ratio (IFR) of Covid accept returned results between 0.04% and 0.5%. Meaning Covid'due south survival rate is at least 99.five%.

*

2. There has been NO unusual excess mortality. The press has called 2020 the Great britain'due south "deadliest year since world war two", but this is misleading because information technology ignores the massive increase in the population since that time. A more reasonable statistical measure of bloodshed is Age-Standardised Mortality Rate (ASMR):

By this measure out, 2020 isn't fifty-fifty the worst year for bloodshedsince 2000, In fact since 1943only ix years have been meliorate than 2020.

Similarly, in the The states the ASMR for 2020 is only at 2004 levels:

For a detailed breakdown of how Covid affected mortality across Western Europe and the The states click here. What increases in mortality we take seen could exist attributable to non-Covid causes [facts seven, ix & 19].

*

iii. "Covid death" counts are artificially inflated. Countries around the world have been defining a "Covid death" every bit a"expiryby whatsoever cause within 28/30/60 days of a positive test".

Healthcare officials from Italy, Germany, the United kingdom, U.s.a., Northern Republic of ireland and others have all admitted to this exercise:

Removing whatsoever distinction between dyingof Covid, and dying of something elselater testing positive for Covid volition naturally lead to over-counting of "Covid deaths". British pathologist Dr John Lee was warning of this "substantial over-gauge" equally early as last spring. Other mainstream sources have reported it, too.

Considering the huge percentage of "asymptomatic" Covid infections [xiv], the well-known prevalence of serious comorbidities [fact 4] and the potential for imitation-positive tests [fact xviii], this renders the Covid expiry numbers an extremely unreliable statistic.

*

iv. The vast majority of covid deaths accept serious comorbidities. In March 2020, the Italian government published statistics showing 99.2% of their "Covid deaths" had at least 1 serious comorbidity.

These included cancer, heart affliction, dementia, Alzheimer's, kidney failure and diabetes (amongst others). Over 50% of them hadthree or more serious pre-existing weather condition.

This pattern has held upwards in all other countries over the course of the "pandemic". An October 2020 FOIA request to the Great britain'southward ONS revealed less than 10% of the official "Covid death" count at that time had Covid as the sole cause of decease.

*

five. Average age of "Covid expiry" is greater than the average life expectancy. The average age of a "Covid death" in the UK is 82.5 years. In Italian republic it'southward 86. Germany, 83. Switzerland, 86. Canada, 86. The Us, 78, Australia, 82.

In almost all cases the median age of a "Covid death"is college than the national life expectancy.

As such, for most of the globe, the "pandemic" has had little-to-no impact on life expectancy. Contrast this with the Spanish influenza, which saw a 28% drop in life expectancy in the The states in but over a year. [source]

*

vi. Covid mortality exactly mirrors the natural mortality curve. Statistical studies from the U.k. and Bharat have shown that the curve for "Covid death" follows the curve for expected bloodshed most exactly:

The risk of death "from Covid" follows, nearly exactly, your background run a risk of decease in general.

The small increment for some of the older age groups can be deemed for past other factors.[facts 7, 9 & 19]

*

vii. At that place has been a massive increment in the use of "unlawful" DNRs. Watchdogs and regime agencies have reported huge increases in the use of Do Not Resuscitate Orders (DNRs) over the terminal 20 months.

In the US, hospitals considered "universal DNRs" for any patient who tested positive for Covid, and whistleblowing nurses take admitted the DNR system was driveling in New York.

In the Great britain there was an "unprecdented" rise in "illegal" DNRs for disabled people, GP surgeries sent out messages to non-concluding patients recommending they sign DNR orders, whilst other doctors signed "coating DNRs" forunabridged nursing homes.

A study done by Sheffield Univerisity found over 1-third of all "suspected" Covid patients had a DNR attached to their file within 24 hours of hospital admission.

Blanket use of coerced or illegal DNR orders could account for any increases in mortality in 2020/21.[Facts 2 & 6]

*  *  *

Office Two: LOCKDOWNS

viii. Lockdowns exercise non prevent the spread of illness. There is picayune to no testify lockdowns accept any impact on limiting "Covid deaths". If yous compare regions that locked downwardly to regions that did non, you tin can see no pattern at all.

"Covid deaths" in Florida (no lockdown) vs California (lockdown)

"Covid deaths" in Sweden (no lockdown) vs U.k. (lockdown)

*

9. Lockdowns impale people. There is potent evidence that lockdowns – through social, economical and other public wellness impairment – are deadlier than the "virus".

Dr David Nabarro, Earth Health Organization special envoy for Covid-19 described lockdowns as a "global ending" in October 2020:

We inthe World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as the principal means of control of the virus[…] it seems we may accept a doubling of globe poverty past adjacent year. We may well have at least a doubling of child malnutrition […] This is a terrible, ghastly global ending."

A United nations report from April 2020 warned of 100,000s of children being killed by the economic touch of lockdowns, while tens of millions more face possible poverty and famine.

Unemployment, poverty, suicide, alcoholism, drug use and other social/mental health crises are spiking all over the earth. While missed and delayed surgeries and screenings are going to see increased mortality from heart disease, cancer et al. in the near future.

The bear upon of lockdown would account for the minor increases in excess bloodshed [Facts 2 & half dozen]

*

10. Hospitals were never unusually over-burdened. the main argument used to defend lockdowns is that "flattening the curve" would prevent a rapid influx of cases and protect healthcare systems from collapse. Merely virtually healthcare systems were never close to collapse at all.

In March 2020 it was reported that hospitals in Spain and Italia were over-flowing with patients, but this happens every flu season. In 2017 Spanish hospitals were at 200% capacity, and 2015 saw patients sleeping in corridors. A paper JAMA paper from March 2020 constitute that Italian hospitals"typically run at 85-xc% capacity in the winter months".

In the Uk, the NHS is regularly stretched to breaking point over the winter.

Every bit office of their Covid policy, the NHS appear in Spring of 2020 that they would be"re-organizing hospital chapters in new means to care for Covid and not-Covid patients separately" and that "as consequence hospitals will experience chapters pressures at lower overall occupancy rates than would previously have been the case."

This means they removed thousands of beds.  During an alleged deadly pandemic, they reduced the maximum occupancy of hospitals. Despite this, the NHS never felt pressure beyond your typical flu season, and at times actually had 4x more empty beds than normal.

In both the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland and United states of america millions were spent on temporary emergency hospitals that were never used.

*  *  *

PART III: PCR TESTS

11. PCR tests were not designed to diagnose disease. The Reverse-Transcriptase Polymerase Concatenation Reaction (RT-PCR) test is described in the media as the "gold standard" for Covid diagnosis. Just the Nobel Prize-winning inventor of the process never intended it to be used as a diagnostic tool, and said so publicly:

PCR is just a process that allows you to make a whole lot of something out of something. It doesn't tell you that you are sick, or that the thing that you ended up with was going to hurt you or anything like that."

*

12. PCR Tests have a history of existence inaccurate and unreliable. The "gold standard" PCR tests for Covid are known to produce a lot of false-positive results, by reacting to Dna fabric that is not specific to Sars-Cov-2.

A Chinese study constitute the same patient could become two different results from the aforementioned test on the same day. In Germany, tests are known to have reacted to common common cold viruses. A 2006 study plant PCR tests for one virus responded to other viruses too. In 2007, a reliance on PCR tests resulted in an "outbreak" of Whooping Cough that never actually existed. Some tests in the U.s. even reacted to the negative control sample.

The late President of Tanzania, John Magufuli, submitted samples goat, pawpaw and motor oil for PCR testing, all came back positive for the virus.

Equally early every bit February of 2020 experts were admitting the test was unreliable. Dr Wang Cheng, president of the Chinese University of Medical Sciences told Chinese land television"The accuracy of the tests is only 30-50%". The Australian regime's ain website claimed"In that location is limited testify available to appraise the accurateness and clinical utility of available COVID-xix tests." And a Portuguese courtroom ruled that PCR tests were"unreliable" and should non be used for diagnosis.

You can read detailed breakdowns of the failings of PCR tests here, here and here.

*

xiii. The CT values of the PCR tests are too high. PCR tests are run in cycles, the number of cycles you utilize to get your result is known every bit your "cycle threshold" or CT value. Kary Mullis said:"If you have to go more 40 cycles[…]there is something seriously wrong with your PCR."

The MIQE PCR guidelines concur, stating:"[CT] values higher than 40 are suspect because of the implied depression efficiency and generally should not exist reported," Dr Fauci himself even admitted annihilation over 35 cycles is near never culturable.

Dr Juliet Morrison, virologist at the University of California, Riverside, told the New York Times:Any test with a cycle threshold above 35 is besides sensitive…I'thousand shocked that people would remember that twoscore [cycles] could correspond a positive…A more reasonable cutoff would be xxx to 35″.

In the same article Dr Michael Mina, of the Harvard Schoolhouse of Public Health, said the limit should be 30, and the writer goes on to point out that reducing the CT from 40 to 30 would have reduced "covid cases" in some states by every bit much as 90%.

The CDC's own data suggests no sample over 33 cycles could be cultured, and Federal republic of germany's Robert Koch Institute says nothing over 30 cycles is likely to be infectious.

Despite this, information technology is known almost all the labs in the US are running their tests at to the lowest degree 37 cycles and sometimes as high as 45. The NHS "standard operating procedure" for PCR tests rules prepare the limit at twoscore cycles.

Based on what we know about the CT values, the majority of PCR exam results are at best questionable.

*

14. The World Health Arrangement (Twice) Admitted PCR tests produced false positives.In December 2020 WHO put out a briefing memo on the PCR process instructing labs to be wary of high CT values causing false positive results:

when specimens return a high Ct value, it means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between groundwork noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain.

Then, in January 2021, the WHO released another memo, this fourth dimension warning that "asymptomatic" positive PCR tests should be re-tested considering they might be imitation positives:

Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or dissimilar NAT technology.

*

15. The scientific footing for Covid tests is questionable. The genome of the Sars-Cov-2 virus was supposedly sequenced past Chinese scientists in December 2019, then published on January tenth 2020. Less than 2 weeks later, German language virologists (Christian Drosten et al.) had allegedly used the genome to create assays for PCR tests.

They wrote a paper,Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) past existent-time RT-PCR, which was submitted for publication on Jan 21st 2020, and then accustomed on January 22nd. Meaning the paper wasallegedly "peer-reviewed" in less than 24 hours. A process that typically takes weeks.

Since and then, a consortium of over 40 life scientists has petitioned for the withdrawal of the paper, writing a lengthy report detailing 10 major errors in the paper'south methodology.

They have also requested the release of the periodical's peer-review report, to show the paper really did pass through the peer-review procedure. The journal has yet to comply.

The Corman-Drosten assays are the root of every Covid PCR test in the world. If the paper is questionable, every PCR test is also questionable.

*  *  *

Part Iv: "ASYMPTOMATIC INFECTION"

sixteen. The majority of Covid infections are "asymptomatic". From as early every bit March 2020, studies done in Italy were suggesting 50-75% of positive Covid tests had no symptoms. Another UK study from August 2020 constitute every bit much every bit 86% of "Covid patients"experienced no viral symptoms at all.

It is literally impossible to tell the divergence between an "asymptomatic case" and a false-positive test result.

*

17. There is very niggling evidence supporting the alleged danger of "asymptomatic transmission". In June 2020, Dr Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the WHO's emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, said:

From the data nosotros have, it yet seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary private,"

A meta-analysis of Covid studies, published by Periodical of the American Medical Association (JAMA) in December 2020, found that asymptomatic carriers had a less than 1% chance of infecting people within their household. Another report, done on influenza in 2009, constitute:

…limited evidence to suggest the importance of [asymptomatic] transmission. The role of asymptomatic or presymptomatic influenza-infected individuals in disease manual may have been overestimated…"

Given the known flaws of the PCR tests, many "asymptomatic cases" may be false positives.[fact fourteen]

*  *  *

PART 5: VENTILATORS

xviii. Ventilation is NOT a handling for respiratory viruses. Mechanical ventilation is not, and never has been, recommended treatment for respiratory infection of any kind. In the early days of the pandemic, many doctors came forrad questioning the use of ventilators to care for "Covid".

Writing in The Spectator, Dr Matt Strauss stated:

Ventilators do non cure any disease. They can make full your lungs with air when you detect yourself unable to do so yourself. They are associated with lung diseases in the public'southward consciousness, but this is not in fact their most common or most appropriate application.

German Pulmonologist Dr Thomas Voshaar, chairman of Association of Pneumatological Clinics said:

When we read the beginning studies and reports from China and Italy, we immediately asked ourselves why intubation was so common there.This contradicted our clinical experience with viral pneumonia.

Despite this, the WHO, CDC, ECDC and NHS all "recommended" Covid patients exist ventilated instead of using non-invasive methods.

This was non a medical policy designed to best treat the patients, just rather to reduce the hypothetical spread of Covid by preventing patients from exhaling aerosol droplets.

*

19. Ventilators killed people. Putting someone who is suffering from influenza, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or whatever other status which restricts animate or affects the lungs, volition not alleviate whatever of those symptoms. In fact, it will almost certainly make it worse, and will kill many of them.

Intubation tubes are a source of potential a infection known as "ventilator-associated pneumonia", which studies show affects up to 28% of all people put on ventilators, and kills 20-55% of those infected.

Mechanical ventilation is also damaging to the physical construction of the lungs, resulting in "ventilator-induced lung injury", which tin dramatically bear upon quality of life, and even result in decease.

Experts approximate forty-50% of ventilated patients dice, regardless of their disease. Around the globe, betwixt 66 and 86% of all "Covid patients" put on ventilators died.

According to the "hole-and-corner nurse", ventilators were existence used so improperly in New York, they were destroying patients' lungs:

This policy was negligence at best, and potentially deliberate murder at worst. This misuse of ventilators could business relationship for any increase in mortality in 2020/21 [Facts 2 & vi]

*  *  *

PART Vi: MASKS

20. Masks don't work. At least a dozen scientific studies accept shown that masks do nothing to stop the spread of respiratory viruses.

One meta-assay published by the CDC in May 2020 establish"no pregnant reduction in influenza transmission with the employ of face masks".

Another study with over 8000 subjects found masks"did not seem to be effective against laboratory-confirmed viral respiratory infections nor against clinical respiratory infection."

There are literally as well many to quote them all, just you can read them: [1][2][three][four][5][6][vii][8][ix][10] Or read a summary past SPR here.

While some studies have been done claiming to testify mask do work for Covid, they are all seriously flawed. I relied on cocky-reported surveys every bit data. Some other was then desperately designed a panel of experts demand it exist withdrawn. A tertiary was withdrawn after its predictions proved entirely incorrect.

The WHO deputed their own meta-analysis in the Lancet, merely that study looked simply at N95 masks and merely in hospitals. [For full run down on the bad information in this study click hither.]

Aside from scientific evidence, in that location's plenty of real-world evidence that masks do nothing to halt the spread of disease.

For instance, Northward Dakota and S Dakota had virtually-identical case figures, despite one having a mask-mandate and the other not:

In Kansas, counties without mask mandates actually had fewer Covid "cases" than countieswith mask mandates. And despite masks being very common in Japan, they had their worst flu outbreak in decades in 2019.

*

21. Masks are bad for your wellness. Wearing a mask for long periods, wearing the same mask more than than once, and other aspects of cloth masks can exist bad for your wellness. A long study on the detrimental effects of mask-wearing was recently published by theInternational Periodical of Environmental Research and Public Health

Dr. James Meehan reported in Baronial 2020 he was seeing increases in bacterial pneumonia, fungal infections, facial rashes .

Masks are likewise known to contain plastic microfibers, which damage the lungs when inhaled and may be potentially carcinogenic.

Childen wearing masks encourages mouth-breathing, which results in facial deformities.

People around the world take passed out due to CO2 poisoning while wearing their masks, and some children in China even suffered sudden cardiac abort.

*

22. Masks are bad for the planet. Millions upon millions of dispensable masks accept been used per month for over a yr. A written report from the UN plant the Covid19 pandemic will likely upshot in plastic waste more than doubling in the side by side few years., and the vast bulk of that is face masks.

The written report goes on to warn these masks (and other medical waste) will clog sewage and irrigation systems, which volition have knock on effects on public health, irrigation and agriculture.

A study from the University of Swansea found"heavy metals and plastic fibres were released when throw-abroad masks were submerged in water." These materials are toxic to both people and wild animals.

*  *  *

Function VII: VACCINES

23. Covid "vaccines" are totally unprecedented. Earlier 2020 no successful vaccine against a human coronavirus had ever been adult. Since then we have allegedlymade 20 of them in xviii months.

Scientists have been trying to develop a SARS and MERS vaccine for years with little success. Some of the failed SARS vaccines actually caused hypersensitivity to the SARS virus. Pregnant that vaccinated mice could potentially get the diseasemore severely than unvaccinated mice. Another attempt acquired liver damage in ferrets.

While traditional vaccines work by exposing the body to a weakened strain of the microorganism responsible for causing the disease, these new Covid vaccines are mRNA vaccines.

mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acrid) vaccines theoretically work by injecting viral mRNA into the body, where it replicates inside your cells and encourages your body to recognise, and make antigens for, the "spike proteins" of the virus. They accept been the field of study of research since the 1990s, but earlier 2020 no mRNA vaccine was ever approved for apply.

*

24. Vaccines do non confer immunity or prevent transmission. Information technology is readily admitted that Covid "vaccines" practicenon confer immunity from infection and practisenon prevent y'all from passing the disease onto others. Indeed, an article in the British Medical Journal highlighted that the vaccine studies were not designed to even try and assess if the "vaccines" limited manual.

The vaccine manufacturers themselves, upon releasing the untested mRNA gene therapies, were quite clear their product'south "efficacy" was based on "reducing the severity of symptoms".

*

25. The vaccines were rushed and have unknown longterm furnishings.Vaccine development is a tedious, laborious procedure. Usually, from evolution through testing and finally being approved for public use takes many years. The various vaccines for Covid were all developed and approved in less than a year. Obviously at that place can be no long-term safety data on chemicals which are less than a year old.

Pfizer even acknowledge this is true in the leaked supply contract between the pharmaceutical behemothic, and the government of Albania:

the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are non currently known and that at that place may be agin effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known

Further, none of the vaccines have been field of study to proper trials. Many of them skipped early-phase trials entirely, and the belatedly-stage homo trials have either not been peer-reviewed, take not released their data, will not finish until 2023 or were abandoned after "severe adverse effects".

*

26. Vaccine manufacturers have been granted legal indemnity should they crusade harm. The USA's Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP) grants immunity until at to the lowest degree 2024.

The Eu'due south product licensing police force does the aforementioned, and there are reports of confidential liability clauses in the contracts the EU signed with vaccine manufacturers.

The UK went even further, granting permanent legal indemnity to the regime, and whatsoever employees thereof, for whatsoever harm done when a patient is being treated for Covid19 or "suspected Covid19".

Again, the leaked Albanian contract suggests that Pfizer, at least, fabricated this indemnity a standard need of supplying Covid vaccines:

Purchaser hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Pfizer […] from and against any and all suits, claims, actions, demands, losses, damages, liabilities, settlements, penalties, fines, costs and expenses

*  *  *

PART Viii: Deception & FOREKNOWLEDGE

27. The European union was preparing "vaccine passports" at least a Yr before the pandemic began. Proposed COVID countermeasures, presented to the public as improvised emergency measures, accept existed since before the emergence of the disease.

Ii EU documents published in 2018, the"2018 State of Vaccine Conviction" and a technical written report titled"Designing and implementing an immunisation information system" discussed the plausibility of an EU-broad vaccination monitoring organisation.

These documents were combined into the 2019 "Vaccination Roadmap", which (among other things) established a "feasibility study" on vaccine passports to begin in 2019 and finish in 2021:

This study'southward concluding conclusions were released to the public in September 2019, only a month before Upshot 201 (below).

*

28. A "grooming exercise" predicted the pandemic but weeks before it started. In October 2019 the Globe Economic Forum and Johns Hopkins University held Event 201. This was a training exercise based on a zoonotic coronavirus starting a worldwide pandemic. The exercise was sponsored past the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and GAVI the vaccine alliance.

The exercise published its findings and recommendations in November 2019 equally a "call to activeness". One calendar month later, Communist china recorded their showtime instance of "Covid".

*

29. Since the beginning of 2020, the Influenza has "disappeared". In the United States, since Februart 2020, flu cases have allegedly dropped past over 98%.

It'south not just the United states either, globally influenza has patently almost completely disappeared.

Meanwhile, a new disease chosen "Covid", which has identical symptoms and a similar mortality charge per unit to influenza, is supposedly sweeping the globe.

*

30. The elite have made fortunes during the pandemic. Since the commencement of lockdown the wealthiest people take go significantly wealthier. Forbes reported that 40 new billionaires have been created "fighting the coronavirus", with 9 of them being vaccine manufacturers.

Business Insider reported that"billionaires saw their cyberspace worth increase by half a trillion dollars" by October 2020.

Conspicuously that number will be even bigger by now.

*  *  *

These are the vital facts of the pandemic, presented here as a resource to help formulate and back up your arguments with friends or strangers. Thank you to all the researchers who have collated and nerveless this data over the last 20 months, especially Swiss Policy Inquiry.

brizendineaber1997.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/30-facts-you-need-know-covid-cribsheet

Share this post